Skip to main content
MTMedTechNet
Open navigation

Stage 03 of 12

Feasibility

Retire the highest technical, clinical, and commercial uncertainties.

Entry criteria

  • Critical requirements and assumptions are identified
  • Candidate technical approaches can be compared
  • Success and failure criteria are defined

Required activities

  • Prototype the highest-risk functions
  • Run bench experiments and architecture trade studies
  • Assess biological, electrical, software, and use-related risks
  • Estimate cost, schedule, and supply-chain constraints

Expected deliverables

  • Feasibility evidence package
  • Architecture decision record
  • Preliminary risk analysis
  • Development estimate and recommendation

Recommended capabilities

Look for providers with relevant device, market, and stage experience—not capability labels alone.

Common risks

  • Testing easy functions instead of critical uncertainties
  • Mistaking a demonstration for repeatable performance
  • Ignoring production constraints during architecture selection

Exit criteria

  • Critical feasibility questions have objective evidence
  • A preferred architecture is selected with documented tradeoffs
  • Residual uncertainties are acceptable for formal development

Suggested next actions

  • Create the integrated development plan
  • Confirm regulatory classification and strategy
  • Establish design controls and project governance

Find your next move

Build confidence in feasibility.

Map your current evidence and gaps to the capabilities needed for this stage.